self help workshops
I'm not the biggest fan of self-help books. I acknowledge the good intentions behind these books, talks and workshops. However, there is a stark difference between good self-help and poor self-help. I'm not talking about the spirtual enlightenment and nirvana type of self-help because I do not subscribe to that school of thought. In any case, here's what agitated me to write a new post.
I was helping my mother transcribe part of a self-help seminar which she attended recently. The speaker was supposedly renowned and highly sought after by celebrities and the wealthy for the self-help advice. Arming myself with a positive attitude to transcribe a seemingly interesting topic on leadership and image mastery, I embarked on my attempt of transcribing.
It was barely four minutes into the talk that I realized I was transcribing rubbish. Not that I was poor at transcribing- I have transcribed debate speeches- word for word with fillers and pauses. Rather it was the speaker that had
a) such a terrible enounciation I had to blast my speakers;
b) such terrible grammar which made it a pain to listen to;
c) redundant points. Absolutely redundant points. It was so awful, I gave up transcribing the piece for my mum after less than ten minutes.
In summation, maybe the speaker was trying to rouse up the audience's interest and share personal stories with them. Sure, but it didn't have to be seven minutes of pure irrelevance.
I may sound pissy, but I assure you that my emotions are well under control and that no one, absolutely no one should be forgiven for horrible grammar and utter nonsense.
PS: the latter does not apply to debaters, lawyers and politicians. it's their ricebowl. be nice.
